Update the TODO.
Chris Pressey
2 years ago
0 | 0 | TODO |
1 | 1 | ==== |
2 | 2 | |
3 | * make torrent | |
3 | These are mostly just aspirational. I don't realistically expect most | |
4 | of them to happen. | |
4 | 5 | |
5 | for 0.5 | |
6 | ------- | |
6 | * The Platform includes git repos, but no git tooling to manipulate | |
7 | them with. Last time I tried, git is written in C++ and difficult | |
8 | to build; Dulwich exists, but was not very mature and couldn't | |
9 | really support a command-line tool to do the things git does. | |
7 | 10 | |
8 | * better shelf_test, don't abort on a single failed test | |
9 | ||
10 | * restructure The Platform to consist of multiple sub-platforms | |
11 | ||
12 | * Update and release the things we punted on for 0.4: | |
13 | * SixtyPical | |
14 | * Chrysoberyl — actually, it's stale and needs updating | |
15 | * Castile | |
16 | * Maentwrog | |
17 | * Befunge-93 | |
18 | * Braktif | |
19 | * Canvas Feedback | |
20 | ||
21 | * If we have git repos, version git clones after docking them. To do this | |
22 | we either need to mess with Dulwich (sigh) or build git on the guest. | |
23 | Somehow. (also sigh.) | |
24 | ||
25 | * Dulwich 0.9.5 ♢ | |
26 | ||
27 | * PyYaml and Jinja2, for kinoje and Chrysoberyl. Also, build HTML files | |
28 | from Chrysoberyl and let them be viewed with Links? Also build | |
29 | The Dossier this way? It would be really cool if Links could browse | |
30 | Markdown files directly. | |
11 | * Restructure The Platform to consist of multiple sub-platforms. | |
31 | 12 | |
32 | 13 | * py-editdist, perhaps? For NaNoGenLab. |
33 | 14 | |
34 | Older Notes | |
35 | ----------- | |
15 | * Build HTML files from Chrysoberyl, The Dossier, etc., and let them be | |
16 | viewed with Links? Or include a console Markdown viewer? It would be | |
17 | really cool if Links could browse Markdown files directly, but I'm | |
18 | pretty sure it doesn't. | |
19 | ||
20 | * External documents linked to from The Dossier aren't included. | |
21 | Where it makes sense, it would be good if they could be pulled in. | |
22 | Actually, this is an issue with the website too. | |
36 | 23 | |
37 | 24 | * Devtools stage. Not docked anymore, but maybe bring it back: |
38 | 25 |